Because Walking Wounded is a pastiche of classic war comics it throws up a particularly thorny issue, which is just how jingoistic can/should the tone be?
Our first effort, The Resistance That Went Mad, sailed pretty close to the wind in this regard because I decided to make the French characters just as evil as the German ones. The showdown at Agincourt featuring the ghost of Henry the Fifth was also what some might describe as a blow to the entente cordial.
It was not meant seriously, but it would be possible to view the story as pretty xenophobic if taken the wrong way.
With Island of Terror I've had to be a lot more careful, partly because the comedy is not so broad, meaning a more realistic portrayal of the enemy is called for, but partly as well because this is a more sensitive time.
The new Walking Wounded comic will feature the British as unquestionably the good guys and the Nazis as extraordinarily bad, but there will be a bit more of a grounded approach to it.
There will be a clear difference between the term Nazi and the term German (or "Jerry" to use the traditional war comic form). All Nazis will be as bad as ever, but not all Germans will be Nazis. All the zombie Germans will be Nazis, though, because good guy zombies are rather thin on the ground.
There wont be much flag-waving in Island of Terror, but that doesn't mean it's going to be full of peacenik crap about Winston Churchill committing war crimes.
World War 2 gives an excellent opportunity to portray British soldiers as unambiguously heroic. Obviously if the stories were set in present day Iraq we'd have to do it a different way (Steve's solo project Another World is about as anti-jingoistic as you can get) but it's hard to look at the fight against Hitler as anything but a morally justifiable and necessary conflict.
The fight against Hitler's Nazi Zombies, even moreso.















